Identify differences between theoretical assessment approaches and the strengths and biases of each theory.

PART 2: Application of theories
A. Identify and apply at least two (2) traditional and at least one (1) strengths-based empowerment (alternative) human behavior theories to your case from course text.
You select those theories because they can help you explain the problems or issues that your client presents. Include the following when you introduce your theories of choice (Also, provide a brief Introduction of the person/client ( similar to Part B of Part I) again at the beginning here, if need be):
1. Present assumptions of each traditional theory and their specific concepts. Apply these assumptions and concepts of these theories to the issues or concerns of the individual.
2. Present assumptions of the strengths-based empowerment theory
and its specific concepts. Apply these assumptions and concepts of
these theories to the issues or concerns of the individual.
3. In applying these theories to the client, in order to provide evidence of the suitability of the theories to this client, utilize at least two (2) scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles (recent=2011-present) on EACH of your selected theoretical approach.
4. Identify differences between theoretical assessment approaches and the strengths and biases of each theory.
B. Conclusion:
Summarize and tie together all the relevant content in parts 1 & 2 with a logical conclusion.
Present implications of your case analysis findings for social work practice. Address the reason why this case analysis is important for social work practice with reference to populations at risk and social and economic justice.
Part 2 must include at least seven (7) references and must be between 10 -15 pages. It must follow the APA style 7th edition format. Students will upload their papers as a Word document into Blackboard under Assignments by the due date noted in the course schedule.